Whenever these things happen and I find myself repeatedly typing on google, the word "Ansa", I admit that my fingers tend to add a voice .. "ans to the" ..
Needless to say, these days my focus is on Japan. What do you think of nuclear I had already written some time ago and I reiterate with force and conviction my NO to this form of energy. Now there are
countries that I think, and others, like Italy, which are moving forward.
certainly did not expect an about-face: the risk of a nuclear power plant was already known and so it seems a bit 'hypocritical to behave as if they knew.
In Japan earthquakes are used to manage, and there, between the supporters to the bitter end, however, who tells me that the central Fukushima has held up very well considering the power of the earthquake, but the problem is that at the end of the fair has not held up quite well. The situation is critical, radiation already spread.
We are not yet a new Chernobyl? Ok, but we must necessarily expect such a tragedy?
There are alternative sources of energy constantly opposed and thwarted because not sufficiently profitable. The game worth the candle?
The nuclear
1 - Requires huge investments (both for construction, security, control and maintenance and future dismantling of nuclear), and then a centralized management system with absolutely enormi investimenti di denaro pubblico.
2- L' uranio, attualmente utilizzato come combustibile principale nelle attuali centrali nucleari, è in via di esaurimento, proprio come il petrolio e gli interessi per il controllo dell' uranio sono enormi (quanto sta succedendo in Darfur ne è una prova)
3- Esiste, mai risolto, il problema dello smaltimento delle scorie che coinvolge le generazioni future per millenni
4- Per quanto le centrali più moderne siano studiate e organizzate per ridurre al minimo la probabilità di incidenti, il famoso "cigno nero" può sempre accadere e in tal caso la magnitudo di danno è talmente elevata da rendere il rischio (espresso dal prodotto della probabilità per la magnitudo) comunque high.
5 - In Italy the situation is appalling public organization. I can not even dismantle the old disused stations with safety criteria, not even you look up and properly disposing of hospital waste with residual radioactivity, popular uprisings broke out whenever possible sites are proposed, for decades now we have lost the Technology el 'experience of know how. How can we expect to build and operate new power plants that will be ready, hopefully between 15-20 years?
What is happening should make us think: you can not control nature, but add risk factors such as these seem to me madness.
And to return to Japan after "(...) epslosioni the temperature rises again, full steam forms of radiation, secondary press coverage, it explodes and shines with its load. Those clouds that rise above the plants we see are full of iodine 131 and cesium 137. They travel with the wind and Japan is a country dominated by the wind. Yesterday they went to the east, south today, tomorrow will return to the west.
rain is expected in the next few hours: it will inevitably acid rain and radioactive. If the lease also 'Last of the three reactors, armor, Japan will see hell. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment