In Africa a riot broke out after another, former "chief" (elected "democratically" by the people) fled abroad with more or less tacit approval of the rioters, but, as ever in this period the people fled from Tunisia, Algeria, Egypt (Libya and Iran are prepared), how do you explain that apparently a paradox? That is, you have participated in the revolt of the "poor" you have "won" in that way, but in fact you have won, and instead to participate in the "change" in your country, you'll run away in Italy, with additional probable destination in Germany or England.
Therefore, to understand something we take a step back: the riots - not to be confused with the revolutions, as I explained recently, beginning of street protests - have had it easy because the army has not deployed to defend the power and then the rebels had smoothed the way by the only authority left standing that was not "against" the rebels.
After the "flight" of the former commanders (Ben Ali for Tunisia and Egypt for Mubarack) the power has transferred to the living reality and life of the country, namely the army, even if not in person, has took command of the entire apparatus of command and made the first two moves that are always made in these cases: closure of the Parliament and the abolition of the Constitution, the whole course, in attesa dell’esecuzione di nuove elezioni (anch’esse “democratiche” naturalmente).
I “rivoltosi” ovviamente ci sono rimasti un po’ male, ma hanno fatto buon viso ed hanno accettato; ma quelli un po’ più “smagati”, per intenderci: i giovani, coloro che hanno iniziato la rivolta, quelli anche più acculturati in quanto in possesso di laurea o diploma, hanno compreso che la via a riforme significative è ancora lunga e lastricata da fame e dolore ed hanno deciso di andarsene all’estero, approfittando anche del diminuito controllo delle autorità nei porti di imbarco.
Adesso, come andamento della vita nei Paesi in rivolta, bisogna vedere il comportamento against the powder keg that is represented by Israel in the region: Egypt at the time, with the peace agreement following the Gulf War, served as governor of anti-Israeli tensions, and now, even though the military has confirmed the maintenance of 'peace agreement, we need to see how things go, especially in Palestine and the Gaza Strip.
In all this, as we have seen and heard very often Obama has never had the feeling of the other "power", namely that Europe has not shown any address foreign policy: Europe did not exist in Tunisia and even crisis in the Egyptian, but merely to outline escape routes of European citizens.
And even in emergency landings in Lampedusa, Europe has experienced a visible presence: so many projects on paper, Sarkozy's Union for the Mediterranean Agreement of Barcelona, \u200b\u200bbut none of these resources have been allocated necessary, because the problem has been underestimated, or - and this is much worse - it could be considered "relevant Italian" and then left to our country which is a sort of "aircraft carrier" in the Mediterranean, then, in hindsight, these illegal immigrants yearn to spread to Europe (Germany, Britain and the Nordic countries in the head), so the problem soon or later becomes a common approach to almost everyone.
On the other hand, the English aristocrat Lady Ashton, newly appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs of the EU, with all of you that have to arrange for his highly placed friends, gets some time to think about these quisquiglie; understand the concept? ?